<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TSA (Transpacific Stabilization Agreement) members planning to raise peak season surcharges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.3plwire.com/2006/06/09/tsa-transpacific-stabilization-agreement-members-planning-to-raise-peak-season-surcharges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2006/06/09/tsa-transpacific-stabilization-agreement-members-planning-to-raise-peak-season-surcharges/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:18:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 3plwire</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2006/06/09/tsa-transpacific-stabilization-agreement-members-planning-to-raise-peak-season-surcharges/comment-page-1/#comment-66604</link>
		<dc:creator>3plwire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 00:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3plwire.com/?p=301#comment-66604</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree with you more.  Seems like every time we turn around there are talks of either BAF or Rate increases from the TSA.  The whole ocean shipping market is becoming extremely commoditized.   Just read another article on the JoC that discusses the TSA&#039;s latest reasoning for further increases.  Namely - increased fuel, increased volume from Asia to Europe, and increased intra-Asian traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree with you more.  Seems like every time we turn around there are talks of either BAF or Rate increases from the TSA.  The whole ocean shipping market is becoming extremely commoditized.   Just read another article on the JoC that discusses the TSA&#8217;s latest reasoning for further increases.  Namely &#8211; increased fuel, increased volume from Asia to Europe, and increased intra-Asian traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Saunders</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2006/06/09/tsa-transpacific-stabilization-agreement-members-planning-to-raise-peak-season-surcharges/comment-page-1/#comment-63585</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3plwire.com/?p=301#comment-63585</guid>
		<description>Anyone else getting tired of reading about the TSA&#039;s proposed rate hikes ?  Are they trying to convince themselves or the shippers ?  It&#039;s little more than a marketing blitz right now, socializing the idea of increased costs.  

It&#039;s a brilliant strategy.  They call themselves a &quot;discussion agreement&quot; and then set strategy around rate increases and surcharges.  Unfortunately for them, the exercise if flawed.  Carriers do not have the same cost structure and network, so they should not have the same rates, increases, or surcharges.  Carriers customers have different lanes, volumes, service needs, etc.  These carrier and customer differences make the attempted TSA pricing recommendations seem disingenuous.
  
Carriers should differentiate themselves based on product offering, service, etc.  These are very savvy business people, not &quot;neanderthals&quot; like they&#039;d hope you would believe.  They understand their costs, capacity, and know the real fair market prices that will ensure their profitability.  

The TSA should focus on transportation infrastructure, security, environmental initiatives, etc.  Leave pricing alone.

Everyone wants carriers to be profitable.  A competitive environment will allow this to happen, while continuing to drive efficiency and service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else getting tired of reading about the TSA&#8217;s proposed rate hikes ?  Are they trying to convince themselves or the shippers ?  It&#8217;s little more than a marketing blitz right now, socializing the idea of increased costs.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a brilliant strategy.  They call themselves a &#8220;discussion agreement&#8221; and then set strategy around rate increases and surcharges.  Unfortunately for them, the exercise if flawed.  Carriers do not have the same cost structure and network, so they should not have the same rates, increases, or surcharges.  Carriers customers have different lanes, volumes, service needs, etc.  These carrier and customer differences make the attempted TSA pricing recommendations seem disingenuous.</p>
<p>Carriers should differentiate themselves based on product offering, service, etc.  These are very savvy business people, not &#8220;neanderthals&#8221; like they&#8217;d hope you would believe.  They understand their costs, capacity, and know the real fair market prices that will ensure their profitability.  </p>
<p>The TSA should focus on transportation infrastructure, security, environmental initiatives, etc.  Leave pricing alone.</p>
<p>Everyone wants carriers to be profitable.  A competitive environment will allow this to happen, while continuing to drive efficiency and service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

