American Trucking Association (ATA) takes ports to court over Clean Truck Proposals
July 24, 2008 by SwizStick
Filed under QuickNews, Seafreight
Updated July 29th: Logistics Management has a follow up featuring commentary from a legal expert:
“It’s a blatant attempt to regulate the industry,” said Susan Ross, chair of the international trade practice for Los Angeles law firm Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP.
She added that said such a lawsuit will likely result in an injunction blocking the program.
“If that happens, it puts everything on hold until the case is decided or the injunction is lifted,” she said, adding that the truck replacement program will likely be “delayed at least a year or maybe longer.”
Ross, who is not affiliated with the lawsuit but who has followed the port plan, said the group is saying that the ports cannot impose restrictions on motor carriers that govern the routes, rates or services offered by the private companies.
The ATA has long expressed their concerns over the port of Los Angeles and Long Beach’s separate clean air programs. At the heart of the matter is the Port of Los Angeles’ insistence on implementing a Teamsters Union driven initiative to require all drivers to be employee drivers, effectively banning all owner-operators. Currently the vast majority of the local drayage industry is handled by owner-operators, and the Teamsters would love to be able to change that. Via Logistics Management:
“The time is right for this action,” said Curtis Whalen,executive director, Intermodal Motor Carriers Conference – an ATA affiliate.
In an exclusive interview with LM, Whalen noted that the ATA is not taking issue with any other part of the port’s “Clean Air” programs.
“We only want the courts to examine the one aspect that requires all drivers to be licensed, and which excludes owner-operators,” he said.
As reported in LM, the ATA has been arguing that the ports planned actions represents an effort to enlist their marine terminal operators as the day-to-day enforcers of an unlawful “concession” mechanism which is otherwise unnecessary to the achievement of the important clean air goals included in the ports clean air action plan.
The conference particularly highlighted the Port of LA’s expressed intent to adopt, as part of its clean truck program, a Teamsters-supported scheme to ban owner operator drivers from port transport service and require motor carriers to only use employee drivers. ??In addition, we also argued that the port imposed “concessionaire” contracting requirement amount to a blockading provision at terminal gates preventing motor carriers from engaging in open access competition as intended under federal deregulation.
It was only a matter of time, and as the article from Logistics Management says, the ATA is making good on their threat.



All Roads on Thu, 24th Jul 2008 10:44 pm
Interesting. should a “clean air” program worry about cleaning the air through higher equipment standards. I would think that as long as an owner operator were able to afford the truck/ equipment there wouldn’t be a problem… but I guess politicians need to blame someone for their own lack of leadership on the whole issue..
In China, I am pretty happy to say that we don’t have that barrier. Their motivations here for cleaning up come down to finding cost efficiencies through long term investment strategies. I have several logistics firms that are now looking to find ways to reduce their footprint, and that of their clients, through really forward leaning discussions.
It really is time the US catches up on these issues
R
3plwire on Fri, 25th Jul 2008 12:33 pm
You just argued the entire case for the ATA - that is exactly their contention: what does cleaning up the air have to do with banning owner operators from the ports and requiring them all to be employee drivers of a motor carrier? Where of course The Teamsters could get their hands on them.
This was a scheme introduced by The Teamsters working in conjunction with local environmental groups who were lobbying for various initiatives to be included into the clean air programs. The city of Los Angeles openly welcomed this requirement despite strong objection from the ATA and other groups. Since then they have stubbornly refused to mitigate this requirement and have even spent a sizable amount of money and time hiring Boston Consulting Group to woo major motor carriers to start drayage operations at the ports. So far, it seems they have not been too successful.
As you said, as long as the truck - any truck, owner operator or motor carrier owned - can upgrade their equipment to meet the new standards, then that should be the ultimate goal. Any truck that doesn’t meet those specs? Can’t pick up cargo from the port. Simple and easy.
And it’s not a question of money - all the California ports have raised container fees to help pay for their various clean air efforts, money that can be earmarked to provide funds to those truckers that are struggling financially to upgrade their trucks.
But hey, politics in California trump common sense all the time - as a resident of California, you learn to kind of expect it.
Find Used and New Big Rig Trucks For | Best Trucking Software on Wed, 3rd Sep 2008 2:46 pm
[...] American Trucking Association (ATA) takes ports to court over … [...]