<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Third Party Logistics News - 3PL wire &#187; Splatty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.3plwire.com/author/splatty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.3plwire.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:15:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>DB Schenker to Realign North America Transportation Model</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/07/24/db-schenker-to-realign-north-america-transportation-model/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/07/24/db-schenker-to-realign-north-america-transportation-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Splatty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Cargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=3095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a company press release, German based company DB Schenker has announced a &#8220;strategic realignment&#8221; of their North American distribution operating model.
Under the realignment, DB Schenker will transition its operations from an asset based model to a non-fixed asset model and will phase out their dedicated US based fleet.  This portion of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a company <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110722005123/en/DB-Schenker-Announces-Strategic-Realignment-North-American">press release</a>, German based company DB Schenker has announced a &#8220;strategic realignment&#8221; of their North American distribution operating model.</p>
<p>Under the realignment, DB Schenker will transition its operations from an asset based model to a non-fixed asset model and will phase out their dedicated US based fleet.  This portion of the business represents only 10% of their overall US business which was primarily serviced through their BAX Global integration.  The US business serviced by DB Schenker&#8217;s international air, ocean, contract logistics and warehousing operations will remain fully operational and is unaffected by this realignment.</p>
<p>The following was given as reasons for the US realignment:</p>
<blockquote><p>“As a result of the prolonged recession and spiking fuel prices, more and more of our customers are opting for expedited ground-based solutions instead of domestic air freight, and they are looking for partners who can provide transportation management services rather than transactional transportation,” said Heiner Murmann, CEO of Schenker, Inc.</p></blockquote>
<p>Approximately 700 employees (primarily part-time positions) will be affected. The company has stated that they are working to redeploy as many employees as possible to other parts of the business.</p>
<blockquote><p>With almost $3 billion in revenue, over 200 locations and in excess of 10,000 employees, DB Schenker is one of the leading logistics providers in the Americas. The company is currently ranked #2 in air freight, #4 in ocean freight and #5 in contract logistics and supply chain management in North America.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/07/24/db-schenker-to-realign-north-america-transportation-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asia Air Cargo Demand Declines 9.8 Percent</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/06/30/asia-air-cargo-demand-declines-9-8-percent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/06/30/asia-air-cargo-demand-declines-9-8-percent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Splatty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Cargo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=3090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a press release from the Association of Asia Pacific Airlines, air freight volume in May declined 9.8 percent when compared to the same time last year.  Despite a 4.7 percent reduction in freight capacity, the average international freight load factor fell by 3.9 percentage points to 68.8 percent for the month.
Commenting on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a <a href="http://www.aapairlines.org/resource_centre/AAPA_PR_Issue11_MayTrafficResults_24Jun11.pdf">press release</a> from the Association of Asia Pacific Airlines, air freight volume in May declined 9.8 percent when compared to the same time last year.  Despite a 4.7 percent reduction in freight capacity, the average international freight load factor fell by 3.9 percentage points to 68.8 percent for the month.</p>
<p>Commenting on the results, Mr. Herdman (AAPA Director General) said the following:</p>
<blockquote><p>Over the first five months of the year, Asian airlines have seen 2.5 percent growth in the number of international passengers carried, whereas international air cargo traffic has declined 2.4 percent during the same period.  The combination of slower revenue growth and sharply higher fuel costs means airlines operating margins are under severe pressure.  Continued vigilance in controlling costs, and carefully matching capacity to the projected changes in demand will be the key to sustaining profitability.</p></blockquote>
<p>Mr. Herdman also suggested that the decline in volume reflects some moderation in the pace of global economic growth when compared to a very strong rebound in global demand that we experienced last year.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see if demand picks up as we head into the second half of the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/06/30/asia-air-cargo-demand-declines-9-8-percent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2011 Ocean Rates</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/03/30/2011-ocean-rates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/03/30/2011-ocean-rates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Splatty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seafreight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=3070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first round of carrier negotiations are in the books for my company and as usual carrier rates are all over the board.  With all of my responses in, the average difference between the lowest offering and the highest is roughly $700 to $800 per 40&#8242; out of China base ports to the US. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first round of carrier negotiations are in the books for my company and as usual carrier rates are all over the board.  With all of my responses in, the average difference between the lowest offering and the highest is roughly $700 to $800 per 40&#8242; out of China base ports to the US.  Needless to say, those on the high end were quickly eliminated.  In looking at the most competitive offers this year, it appears that my overall cost per 40&#8242; container will dip slightly from last year&#8217;s rates even with the recent increase in BAF.  I would be curious to know if your ocean rates increased, decreased, or remained constant.  Drop us a line and let us know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/03/30/2011-ocean-rates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diesel prices up 14.3 cents per gallon</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/03/02/diesel-prices-up-14-3-cents-per-gallon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/03/02/diesel-prices-up-14-3-cents-per-gallon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 08:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Splatty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc Logistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=3062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not good.  Citing unrest in the Middle East, diesel prices increased 14.3 cents to settle in at a national average of $3.716 per gallon, the highest since 2008.
Via JOC.com:
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not good.  Citing unrest in the Middle East, diesel prices increased 14.3 cents to settle in at a national average of $3.716 per gallon, the highest since 2008.</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.joc.com/trucking/diesel-soars-143-cents-3716-gallon-oil-fears">JOC.com</a>:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/03/02/diesel-prices-up-14-3-cents-per-gallon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ocean freight rates on the decline?</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/01/17/ocean-freight-rates-on-the-decline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/01/17/ocean-freight-rates-on-the-decline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 08:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Splatty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seafreight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=3037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone else notice that ocean freight rates are declining?  I was recently approached by an NVO with rates out of China to the U.S. that are approximately $100 to $200 lower than what was offered back in November.  Even with the carriers implementing a pre-Chinese New Year peak, rates appear to be headed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else notice that ocean freight rates are declining?  I was recently approached by an NVO with rates out of China to the U.S. that are approximately $100 to $200 lower than what was offered back in November.  Even with the carriers implementing a pre-Chinese New Year peak, rates appear to be headed in a downward trend.  I would be curious to see what others are seeing in the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/01/17/ocean-freight-rates-on-the-decline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2011 Freest Economies: Heritage Foundation Report</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/01/14/2011-freest-economies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/01/14/2011-freest-economies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Splatty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seafreight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=3016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Heritage Foundation has recently released their 2011 Index of Economic Freedom report which details the world&#8217;s freest economies.  The report covers 183 countries across 10 specific freedoms such as trade freedom, business freedom, investment freedom, and property rights.
For the 17th year in a row, Hong Kong assumed the top spot in the rankings. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Heritage Foundation has recently released their <a href="http://www.heritage.org/Index/Ranking">2011 Index of Economic Freedom</a> report which details the world&#8217;s freest economies.  The report covers 183 countries across 10 specific freedoms such as trade freedom, business freedom, investment freedom, and property rights.</p>
<p>For the 17th year in a row, Hong Kong assumed the top spot in the rankings.  </p>
<p>According to the report, economic freedom is described as &#8220;the fundamental right of every human to control his or her own labor and property&#8221;.  The report gives each country a ranking of 1-100 where a score of 100 represents the greatest amount of freedom.  The rankings are based upon the following criteria:</p>
<p>1.  Business Freedom<br />
2.  Trade Freedom<br />
3.  Fiscal Freedom<br />
4.  Government Spending<br />
5.  Monetary Freedom<br />
6.  Investment Freedom<br />
7.  Financial Freedom<br />
8.  Property Rights<br />
9.  Freedom from Corruption<br />
10.  Labor Freedom</p>
<p><strong>2011 Top Ten Rankings</strong><br />
1.  Hong Kong<br />
2.  Singapore<br />
3.  Australia<br />
4.  New Zealand<br />
5.  Switzerland<br />
6.  Canada<br />
7.  Ireland<br />
8.  Denmark<br />
9.  United States<br />
10.  Bahrain</p>
<p>The United States lowest ranking came in the form of government spending at 54.6.</p>
<blockquote><p>
In the most recent year, total government expenditures, including consumption and transfer payments, equaled 38.9 percent of GDP. Spending increases totaled well over $1 trillion in 2009 alone, an increase of more than 20 percent over 2008. Stimulus spending has hurt the fiscal balance and placed federal debt on an unsustainable trajectory. Gross government debt exceeded 90 percent of GDP in 2010.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>The bottom five countries in order:</strong></p>
<p>175.  Venezuela<br />
176.  Eritrea<br />
177.  Cuba<br />
178.  Zimbabwe<br />
179.  North Korea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/01/14/2011-freest-economies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shanghai Overtakes Singapore as World&#8217;s Busiest Container Port</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/01/08/shanghai-overtakes-singapore-as-worlds-busiest-container-port/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/01/08/shanghai-overtakes-singapore-as-worlds-busiest-container-port/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 13:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Splatty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seafreight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=3003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a report on the Shanghai Municipal Government website, Shanghai became the world&#8217;s busiest container port in 2010 after handling 29.05 million TEUs. Singapore, which previously held the number one spot, handled 500,000 less TEU&#8217;s than Shanghai during the year.  Shanghai&#8217;s cargo throughput rose to approximately 650 million tons in 2010, helping to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a report on the Shanghai Municipal Government website, Shanghai became the world&#8217;s busiest container port in 2010 after handling 29.05 million TEUs. Singapore, which previously held the number one spot, handled 500,000 less TEU&#8217;s than Shanghai during the year.  Shanghai&#8217;s cargo throughput rose to approximately 650 million tons in 2010, helping to claim the top global spot.  Government officials cite economic recovery and the Shanghai World Expo as reasons for the increased cargo throughput.  </p>
<p>The report doesn&#8217;t indicate the volume distinction between the Waigaoqiao and Yangshan ports in the Shanghai area.</p>
<p>Singapore had a fairly robust year in terms of growth showing a 10% increase in container throughput over 2009.  A recent report I read indicated that Singapore handled 28.4 million TEU&#8217;s during 2010.  Singapore has consistently been ranked number one in the world as a major transshipment hub for cargo transiting Asia.  Shanghai overtaking Singapore is definitely no small feat and shows how impressive the China machine continues to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2011/01/08/shanghai-overtakes-singapore-as-worlds-busiest-container-port/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OOCL Orders Two 8,888 TEU Vessels</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/12/18/oocl-orders-two-8888-teu-vessels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/12/18/oocl-orders-two-8888-teu-vessels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2010 05:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Splatty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seafreight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=2989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a press release from OOCL, the Hong Kong based carrier has entered into a ship building contract with Hudong for two 8,888 TEU vessels.
Via OOCL.com:

We remain committed to meeting the needs of our customers and we would like to share this news with our valued customers about these newbuilds added to our fleet. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a press release from OOCL, the Hong Kong based carrier has entered into a ship building contract with Hudong for two 8,888 TEU vessels.</p>
<p>Via OOCL.com:</p>
<blockquote><p>
We remain committed to meeting the needs of our customers and we would like to share this news with our valued customers about these newbuilds added to our fleet. We continue to commit substantial investment in assets to support the growth of our customers and the expansion of world trade.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/12/18/oocl-orders-two-8888-teu-vessels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Incoterms 2010 &#8211; DAT and DAP</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/08/04/incoterms-2010-dat-and-dap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/08/04/incoterms-2010-dat-and-dap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 02:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Splatty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incoterms 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=2922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) has announced the launch of the new rule changes to Incoterms® 2010 which will be kicked off during a September event in Paris.  The official implementation of the new rules are scheduled to take place during January of 2011.
On September 27th &#8211; 29th, the ICC will hold a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 3px; float: left;">
<p><!--adsense#Rectangle--></p>
</div>
<p>The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) has announced the launch of the new rule changes to Incoterms® 2010 which will be kicked off during a <a href="http://www.iccwbo.org/Events/Home/Press_relases/ICC_launches_Incoterms%C2%AE_2010_rules_with_major_conference_and_accredited_masterclasses_in_September_in_Paris/">September event in Paris</a>.  The official implementation of the new rules are scheduled to take place during January of 2011.</p>
<p>On September 27th &#8211; 29th, the ICC will hold a series of practical masterclasses on the Incoterms® 2010 rules and provide a detailed presentation of the new rule changes that will be incorporated into the new Incoterms® 2010.  </p>
<p>This revision, the first since 2000, will aim to adapt changes that have occured in global trade over the last ten years.  According the ICC website, the reason for the changes include:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The importance of cargo security, the resulting new obligations on traders, developments in container transport, and the 2004 revision of the United States’ Uniform Commercial Code, which resulted in a deletion of the former US shipment and delivery terms.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Although the book has not been officially released, details on the ICC website show that the most glaring changes to the 2010 version will be the elimination of 4 Incoterms® including, DDU, DEQ, DES, and DAF.  Two new terms will be added; DAT and DAP, bringing the new total of Incoterms® to 11.</p>
<p>Incoterms® 2010 will be arranged into the following groups:</p>
<p><strong>Any Mode of Transport</strong></p>
<p>CIP &#8211; Carriage and Insurance Paid<br />
CPT &#8211; Carriage Paid To<br />
DAP &#8211; Delivered At Place<br />
DAT &#8211; Delivered At Terminal<br />
DDP &#8211; Delivered Duty Paid<br />
EXW &#8211; Ex Works<br />
FCA &#8211; Free Carrier</p>
<p><strong><br />
Sea and Inland Waterway Transport Only</strong><br />
CFR &#8211; Cost and Freight<br />
CIF &#8211; Cost, Insurance and Freight<br />
FAS &#8211; Free Alongside Ship<br />
FOB &#8211; Free On Board</p>
<p>In addition to the 11 rules, Incoterms®2010 will include:</p>
<p>    * Extensive guidance notes and illustrative graphics to help users efficiently choose the right rule for each transaction;<br />
    * New classification to help choosing the most suitable rule in relation to the mode of transport;<br />
    * Advice for the use of electronic procedures;<br />
    * Information on security-related clearances for shipments;<br />
    * Advice for the use of Incoterms® 2010 in domestic trade</p>
<p>This interpretation is provided as a guide only.</p>
<p>Incoterms® are published by the International Chamber of Commerce and are available on their website and official publication “Incoterms® 2010&#8243;. For a complete and official overview please refer to the ICC’s publication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/08/04/incoterms-2010-dat-and-dap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Container volumes surge</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/06/21/container-volumes-surge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/06/21/container-volumes-surge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 03:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Splatty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seafreight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=2904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t expect the container shortage crisis let up anytime soon.  According to a report from the TSA website, container volumes on the Transpacific trade lane showed a first quarter increase of 13% when compared to the same time period in 2009.  The TSA carriers reported a total 1st quarter container volume of 1.27 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t expect the container shortage crisis let up anytime soon.  According to a report from the TSA website, container volumes on the Transpacific trade lane showed a first quarter increase of 13% when compared to the same time period in 2009.  The TSA carriers reported a total 1st quarter container volume of 1.27 million FEUS from Asia to the US.</p>
<p>Via TSAcarriers.org:</p>
<blockquote><p>
“Neither shippers nor carriers were certain as to what direction the market would take coming out of the Lunar New Year holidays,” said Eng Aik Meng, APL Ltd. President, Liner. “Now it appears that the worst is behind us. Despite a pull-back in U.S. job creation and retail sales in May, the pipeline of Asian exports to the U.S. is filling rapidly and consumers are more optimistic over job security and household incomes going forward.” Mr. Eng emphasized that, while headlines have focused on peripheral issues such as European debt and U.S. tax and regulatory developments, many of the underlying fundamentals in the U.S. economy are positive: industrial production and durable goods orders are up, trade is expanding, inflation is low.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Revenue, however, continues to be a sticking point with the carriers.  Many carriers faced record losses in in 2009 with the carriers losing a combined $15 billion.</p>
<blockquote><p>
While revenue gains made by carriers in recent months have made an important contribution to carrier balance sheets, carriers say the increases achieved in the current contract round still do not fully restore rates to the levels of late 2008, let alone provide for long-term viability and service expansion. In addition, to cover the costs of the expected robust peak season, individual TSA lines reaffirmed implementation of a previously announced Peak Season Surcharge.
</p></blockquote>
<p>TSA carriers are moving forward with aggressive plans to implement a Peak Season surcharge of $400 per FEU effective August 1.  However, many carriers have already implemented a peak season surcharge effective in June.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/06/21/container-volumes-surge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

