<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Third Party Logistics News - 3PL wire &#187; Featured</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.3plwire.com/category/featured/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.3plwire.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 02:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Incoterms 2010 &#8211; DAT and DAP</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/08/04/incoterms-2010-dat-and-dap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/08/04/incoterms-2010-dat-and-dap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 02:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Splatty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incoterms 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=2922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) has announced the launch of the new rule changes to Incoterms® 2010 which will be kicked off during a September event in Paris.  The official implementation of the new rules are scheduled to take place during January of 2011.
On September 27th &#8211; 29th, the ICC will hold a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) has announced the launch of the new rule changes to Incoterms® 2010 which will be kicked off during a <a href="http://www.iccwbo.org/Events/Home/Press_relases/ICC_launches_Incoterms%C2%AE_2010_rules_with_major_conference_and_accredited_masterclasses_in_September_in_Paris/">September event in Paris</a>.  The official implementation of the new rules are scheduled to take place during January of 2011.</p>
<p>On September 27th &#8211; 29th, the ICC will hold a series of practical masterclasses on the Incoterms® 2010 rules and provide a detailed presentation of the new rule changes that will be incorporated into the new Incoterms® 2010.  </p>
<p>This revision, the first since 2000, will aim to adapt changes that have occured in global trade over the last ten years.  According the ICC website, the reason for the changes include:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The importance of cargo security, the resulting new obligations on traders, developments in container transport, and the 2004 revision of the United States’ Uniform Commercial Code, which resulted in a deletion of the former US shipment and delivery terms.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Although the book has not been officially released, details on the ICC website show that the most glaring changes to the 2010 version will be the elimination of 4 Incoterms® including, DDU, DEQ, DES, and DAF.  Two new terms will be added; DAT and DAP, bringing the new total of Incoterms® to 11.</p>
<p>Incoterms® 2010 will be arranged into the following groups:</p>
<p><strong>Any Mode of Transport</strong></p>
<p>CIP &#8211; Carriage and Insurance Paid<br />
CPT &#8211; Carriage Paid To<br />
DAP &#8211; Delivered At Place<br />
DAT &#8211; Delivered At Terminal<br />
DDP &#8211; Delivered Duty Paid<br />
EXW &#8211; Ex Works<br />
FCA &#8211; Free Carrier</p>
<p><strong><br />
Sea and Inland Waterway Transport Only</strong><br />
CFR &#8211; Cost and Freight<br />
CIF &#8211; Cost, Insurance and Freight<br />
FAS &#8211; Free Alongside Ship<br />
FOB &#8211; Free On Board</p>
<p>In addition to the 11 rules, Incoterms®2010 will include:</p>
<p>    * Extensive guidance notes and illustrative graphics to help users efficiently choose the right rule for each transaction;<br />
    * New classification to help choosing the most suitable rule in relation to the mode of transport;<br />
    * Advice for the use of electronic procedures;<br />
    * Information on security-related clearances for shipments;<br />
    * Advice for the use of Incoterms® 2010 in domestic trade</p>
<p>This interpretation is provided as a guide only.</p>
<p>Incoterms® are published by the International Chamber of Commerce and are available on their website and official publication “Incoterms® 2010&#8243;. For a complete and official overview please refer to the ICC’s publication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/08/04/incoterms-2010-dat-and-dap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>May Containerized Import Data Update &#8211; Zepol.com</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/06/13/may-containerized-import-data-update-zepol-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/06/13/may-containerized-import-data-update-zepol-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>3plwire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Columns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=2883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On June 5th, we completed the data for May in our U.S. Customs trade data tool, TradeIQ. For the fourth month in a row, import shipments increased, rising 5.68% over April. May 2010 shipments also rose greatly over the previous year, up a whopping 19.55% over May 2009.
Below is a table showing port regions of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On June 5th, we completed the data for May in our U.S. Customs trade data tool, <strong>TradeIQ</strong>. For the fourth month in a row, import shipments increased, rising 5.68% over April. May 2010 shipments also rose greatly over the previous year, up a whopping 19.55% over May 2009.</p>
<p>Below is a table showing port regions of the world where shipments originated:</p>
<p><strong>
<table id="wp-table-reloaded-id-1-no-1" class="wp-table-reloaded wp-table-reloaded-id-1">
<thead>
	<tr class="row-1 odd">
		<th class="column-1">Port Region</th><th class="column-2">May 2010Shipments</th><th class="column-3">Percent Change over Apr 2010</th><th class="column-4">Percent Change over May 2009</th>
	</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
	<tr class="row-2 even">
		<td class="column-1">Asia</td><td class="column-2">559,534</td><td class="column-3">7.63%</td><td class="column-4">23.13%</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-3 odd">
		<td class="column-1">Europe</td><td class="column-2">109,796</td><td class="column-3">1.57%</td><td class="column-4">14.5%</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-4 even">
		<td class="column-1">Central America (includes Mexico)</td><td class="column-2">58,644</td><td class="column-3">3.18%</td><td class="column-4">5.64%</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-5 odd">
		<td class="column-1">South America</td><td class="column-2">22,148</td><td class="column-3">-0.88%</td><td class="column-4">21.99%</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-6 even">
		<td class="column-1">North America</td><td class="column-2">9,508</td><td class="column-3">10.56%</td><td class="column-4">-2.41%</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-7 odd">
		<td class="column-1">Unknown</td><td class="column-2">8,211</td><td class="column-3">-8.85%</td><td class="column-4">8.74%</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-8 even">
		<td class="column-1">Australia</td><td class="column-2">6,868</td><td class="column-3">-6.67%</td><td class="column-4">-1.44%</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-9 odd">
		<td class="column-1">Africa</td><td class="column-2">3,618</td><td class="column-3">-16.69%</td><td class="column-4">28.57%</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="row-10 even">
		<td class="column-1">Totals</td><td class="column-2">778,327</td><td class="column-3">5.68%</td><td class="column-4">19.55%</td>
	</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</strong><br />
<br />
While Asian trade looks strong for May 2010 relative to April 2010 and May 2009, a glance at quarterly shipments since quarter three of 2007 shows that the regions&#8217; shipments have yet to return to pre-recession levels. Though June data is needed before we can compare the performance of quarter two, we can see that with 1,470,958 shipments, quarter one is up 13% over the same quarter in 2009, but still down 7% from 2008.</p>
<p>Below is a chart of Asia&#8217;s quarterly shipments, starting with Quarter 3 of 2007:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.3plwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Zepolmay.jpg"><br />
</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.3plwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Zepolmay1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2888" title="Zepolmay" src="http://www.3plwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Zepolmay1.jpg" alt="" width="569" height="301" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The collection methods used by U.S. Customs for AMS data can lead to an overstatement of shipments for some ports, as imports and exports from Prince Rupert and Vancouver are often recorded as imports for the U.S. Moreover, the data includes shipments from empty containers, may overstate totals from transshipments, and may contain other data anomalies as well.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zepol.com/" target="_blank">Zepol</a>&#8217;s <a href="http://www.zepol.com/Products/TradeIQ/TradeIQ.aspx" target="_blank">U.S. Customs trade data</a> is derived from Bills of Lading entered into the Automated Manifest System. This information represents the number of House manifests entered by importers of waterborne containerized goods. This indicator is the earliest data available for the previous month’s trade activity. <em> </em></p>
<p><em>Kevin Palmstein is the Director of Marketing and Product Development for Zepol Corporation. Zepol is the leading provider of United States trade information. Zepol’s products, TradeIQ™ and TradeView™, provide access to the latest U.S. Import Customs trade data and U.S. Import/Export Census trade statistics respectively. To learn more about Zepol, visit </em><a href="http://www.zepol.com/"><em>www.zepol.com</em></a><em> and read their trade data blog, </em><a href="http://www.zepol.com/blog"><em>www.zepol.com/blog</em></a><em>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/06/13/may-containerized-import-data-update-zepol-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worst crisis in the history of container shipping is not over &#8211; CEO of Maersk Line (a TPM recap)</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/03/02/worst-crisis-in-the-history-of-container-shipping-is-not-over-ceo-of-maersk-line-a-tpm-recap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/03/02/worst-crisis-in-the-history-of-container-shipping-is-not-over-ceo-of-maersk-line-a-tpm-recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 06:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>3plwire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seafreight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=2867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Eivind Kolding, Partner and CEO of Maersk Line, believes that the worst is behind the container line industry, the pain is far from over. As the keynote speaker at this year&#8217;s 2010 Trans-Pacific Maritime Conference in Long Beach this morning, Mr. Kolding noted that while there appears to be a good balance in supply [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Eivind Kolding, Partner and CEO of Maersk Line, believes that the worst is behind the container line industry, the pain is far from over. As the keynote speaker at this year&#8217;s 2010 Trans-Pacific Maritime Conference in Long Beach this morning, Mr. Kolding noted that while there appears to be a good balance in supply vs. demand, it remains fragile. Trade volumes are up, but still way off from historical norms. The supply imbalance of container ships is lower, but still exists. The rate increases the carriers are seeing right now are good, but who knows when someone in the industry will bring in more tonnage than the market can absorb? </p>
<p>2009 was certainly a bad year for carriers: Mr. Kolding cited a 29% drop in container rates that contributed to an estimated $20 billion dollars in industry losses for the year. Import volumes are currently up 13%, but retail sales have only increased by 1%, therefore the volume increases could be short lived once inventory restocking is over. Consumer confidence is up, but still below where it should be. </p>
<p>On the question of industry consolidation, he highlighted the fact that too many players are chasing the same pieces of the pie. Even Maersk Line, the giant in the industry, only controls a 15.8% market share and the top 10 carriers in terms of volume barely control 60% of the market. Despite this, he doesn&#8217;t think we&#8217;ll see any shipping lines go down due to the downturn or from acquisition. Meanwhile, rates on the trans-pacific trade lanes are break-even at best. </p>
<p>Somewhat surprisingly, he had some critical words for his own company and the liner industry as a whole regarding delivery reliability and overall service. I&#8217;m paraphrasing, but he said something to the effect of &#8220;Our delivery reliability is appalling as an industry; best in class is only 60%. If we could get to 95% reliability customers could reduce inventory buffer by 60%.&#8221; He also expressed support for one-click shipping, citing statistics that showed that they amend each BL at least once. </p>
<p>On the question of slow steaming and the ever larger containerships entering the market, he insisted slow steaming was here to stay; partly as an environmental initiative and partly to save on bunker costs. As for the mega ships, he expects the trend for bigger ships to continue. &#8220;There is no reverse in the development of bigger vessels&#8221;, he said and reported that the majority of the vessels being laid up are the smaller, older ships: virtually all of the larger, more economical ships, are all in service. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/03/02/worst-crisis-in-the-history-of-container-shipping-is-not-over-ceo-of-maersk-line-a-tpm-recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 Container Shipping Review &#8211; Zepol.com</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/01/19/2009-container-shipping-review-zepol-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/01/19/2009-container-shipping-review-zepol-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>3plwire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=2821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As everyone in the 3PL community knows, 2009 was a tough year as United States import shipments were down 12.5% and TEUs dropped 11.7% when compared to 2008. The outlook does not look promising as 2010 begins as carriers struggle to stay afloat and rumors of rate increases abound. Below is a review of container [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As everyone in the <a href="http://www.3plwire.com/logistics-links/3pls/">3PL</a> community knows, 2009 was a tough year as United States import shipments were down 12.5% and TEUs dropped 11.7% when compared to 2008. The outlook does not look promising as 2010 begins as carriers struggle to stay afloat and rumors of rate increases abound. Below is a review of container shipping in 2009.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.3plwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/2009-month-trend.png"><img src="http://www.3plwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/2009-month-trend.png" alt="" title="2009 month trend" width="539" height="279" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2822" /></a></p>
<p>The total number of import Bills of Lading has a close relationship with TEUs; looking at the top ten U.S. and International ports shows that few ports saw strong years in 2009.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.3plwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/US-Ports.png"><img src="http://www.3plwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/US-Ports.png" alt="" title="US Ports" width="539" height="325" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2823" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.3plwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Intl-Ports.png"><img src="http://www.3plwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Intl-Ports.png" alt="" title="Intl Ports" width="539" height="326" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2824" /></a></p>
<p>Kevin Palmstein is the Marketing Manager for Zepol Corporation. Zepol is the leading provider of United States trade information. Zepol’s products, TradeIQ™ and TradeView™, provide access to the latest U.S. Import Customs trade data and U.S. Import/Export Census trade statistics respectively. To learn more about Zepol, visit <a href="http://www.zepol.com">www.zepol.com</a> and read their trade data blog, <a href="http://www.zepol.com/blog">www.zepol.com/blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/01/19/2009-container-shipping-review-zepol-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3PL Spotlight &#8211; Pantos Logistics</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/01/07/3pl-spotlight-pantos-logistics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/01/07/3pl-spotlight-pantos-logistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 04:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>3plwire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=2796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Pantos Logistics
http://www.pantos.co.kr/en



Whilst ensuring we continue to expand and develop our service solution to create a competitive advantage for our customers, our primary services encompass both Freight Management and Supply Chain Solutions.

1.	Services Offered
A.	Transport
1.	Domestic and international trucking
2.	Chartered aircraft
3.	FCL &#038; LCL sea transport
4.	Break bulk and heavy cargo
5.	Multi-client consolidation
6.	Shipment consolidation
7.	Cross-docking
8.	Express door-to-door or door-to-port
9.	Re-forwarding
10.	Rail on five continents
B.	Warehousing
1.	Track &#038; trace system [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><a href="http://www.pantos.co.kr/en"><img src="http://www.3plwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/LOGO.gif" alt="" title="LOGO" width="275" height="83" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2787" /></a></center></p>
<p><center>Pantos <a href="http://www.3plwire.com/logistics-links/">Logistics</a><br />
<a href="http://www.pantos.co.kr/en">http://www.pantos.co.kr/en</a><br />
</center></p>
<p><center><a href="http://www.3plwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/pantosdiv.png"><img src="http://www.3plwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/pantosdiv.png" alt="" title="pantosdiv" width="595" height="9" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2802" /></a></center><br />
<br />
Whilst ensuring we continue to expand and develop our service solution to create a competitive advantage for our customers, our primary services encompass both Freight Management and Supply Chain Solutions.</p>
<p>
<strong>1.	Services Offered</strong></p>
<p><strong><em>A.	Transport</em></strong><br />
1.	Domestic and international trucking<br />
2.	Chartered aircraft<br />
3.	FCL &#038; LCL sea transport<br />
4.	Break bulk and heavy cargo<br />
5.	Multi-client consolidation<br />
6.	Shipment consolidation<br />
7.	Cross-docking<br />
8.	Express door-to-door or door-to-port<br />
9.	Re-forwarding<br />
10.	Rail on five continents</p>
<p><strong><em>B.	Warehousing</em></strong><br />
1.	Track &#038; trace system including real time data<br />
2.	Kitting and pick &#038; pack<br />
3.	Bonded storage<br />
4.	Sub-assembly<br />
5.	Inventory management<br />
6.	Marking and labeling</p>
<p><strong><em>C.	Consulting</em></strong><br />
1.	SCM consulting<br />
2.	Customs brokerage<br />
3.	Local legal and clearance formalities<br />
4.	Route planning and costing<br />
5.	Special load planning and supervision</p>
<p><strong>2.	 Value Added Services</strong></p>
<p>1.	Multi-vendor container optimization<br />
2.	Quality inspections<br />
3.	Container match-back<br />
4.	Purchasing services<br />
5.	Vendor managed inventory<br />
6.	Configuration and sub assembly<br />
7.	Product repair and renovation<br />
8.	Recycling and re-boxing<br />
9.	Reverse logistics</p>
<p><strong>3.	 Locations</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pantos.co.kr/en"><img src="http://www.3plwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/pantosloc.png" alt="" title="pantosloc" width="356" height="199" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2790" /></a></p>
<p><strong><em>A.	17 Locations in North America including:</em></strong><br />
1.	New York City<br />
2.	Mexico City<br />
3.	Toronto<br />
4.	Dallas<br />
5.	Los Angeles<br />
6.	Chicago</p>
<p><strong><em>B.	50 Locations in Asia including:</em></strong><br />
1.	Seoul<br />
2.	Tokyo<br />
3.	Osaka<br />
4.	Beijing<br />
5.	Jakarta<br />
6.	Singapore<br />
7.	Hong Kong<br />
8.	Xiamen<br />
9.	Shanghai<br />
10.	Mumbai<br />
11.	Bangkok</p>
<p><strong><em>C.	23 Locations in Europe including:</em></strong><br />
1.	London<br />
2.	Amsterdam<br />
3.	Kiev<br />
4.	St. Petersburg<br />
5.	Vladivostok<br />
6.	Los Angeles<br />
7.	Madrid<br />
8.	Hamburg<br />
9.	Milan<br />
10.	Istanbul</p>
<p><strong><em>D.	4 Locations in the Mid-East and 4 Locations in South America</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>4.	 I.T. Capabilities (Global Single Window System)</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pantos.co.kr/en"><img src="http://www.3plwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/pantosit.png" alt="" title="pantosit" width="595" height="394" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2791" /></a></p>
<p>1.	Cargo tracking management<br />
2.	Real-time inventory management<br />
3.	Electronic shipping documents management<br />
4.	Live video feeds</p>
<p><strong>5.	Competitive Advantage</strong></p>
<p>1.	Providing the majority of logistic services for LG Chem and LG Electronics, Pantos boasts a tremendous amount of expertise in handling chemical and electronic cargo.</p>
<p>2.	Trucking specialized in handling hazardous materials</p>
<p>3.	Shipper’s own containers, including within C.I.S.</p>
<p>4.	Possesses significant bargaining power within Asia</p>
<p>5.	Intimate knowledge of TSR and TCR, including in house customs brokers, allowing for optimum Asia-to-Europe transport.</p>
<p>6.	Offices in five continents and the Mid-East.</p>
<p>7.	The highly adaptable Global Single Window System, including live TV feeds, allows for the greatest possible security in tracking shipments.</p>
<p>8.	51 warehouses worldwide</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2010/01/07/3pl-spotlight-pantos-logistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New HTS Code Trade Data Trend Tool for 3PLwire.com Readers</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2009/11/05/new-hts-code-trade-data-trend-tool-for-3plwire-com-readers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2009/11/05/new-hts-code-trade-data-trend-tool-for-3plwire-com-readers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>3plwire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=2705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most important things that transportation service providers use trade data for is to see the trends for the industries they serve. They want to know where imports are coming from and where exports are going. They examine how much product is being imported and exported; compare the data to the past to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most important things that transportation service providers use trade data for is to see the trends for the industries they serve. They want to know where imports are coming from and where exports are going. They examine how much product is being imported and exported; compare the data to the past to see if how much of an increase or decrease the entire market is seeing.</p>
<p>To this end, Zepol has developed a new feature on our website, <a href="http://www.zepol.com/">www.zepol.com</a>, which provides the most recent trends of U.S. trade statistics for each Harmonized Tariff Code. This information is searchable by HTS Code and also can be drilled down on from our <a href="http://www.zepol.com/Products/TradeView/HTS-Codes.aspx" target="_blank">Current Data by HTS Code</a> page.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zepol.com/HTS/090412.aspx">Check here to see the latest data for HTS Code 0904.12 (Pepper of the Genus Piper (Black and White), Crushed or Ground) to see a sample of one of these pages.</a></p>
<p>These pages show a trend graph and the top 5 countries that the products were imported from and exported to. It also allows you to drill up or down on the HTS code hierarchy. It is our goal that members of the third party logistics industry can uses this information to educate themselves and in turn their customers about the movement of specific goods in an out of the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2009/11/05/new-hts-code-trade-data-trend-tool-for-3plwire-com-readers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shipnomics Shipment Visibility Platform &#8211; Demo</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2009/09/16/shipnomics-shipment-visibility-platform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2009/09/16/shipnomics-shipment-visibility-platform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Splatty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=2615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every once in a while we like to recognize the sponsors of our website and this month we want to take a minute to highlight a fantastic product from Shipnomics.  Shipnomics has released a cutting edge SaaS software service called Transportation Manager Pro.  If you are a logistics manager seeking a one stop [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every once in a while we like to recognize the sponsors of our website and this month we want to take a minute to highlight a fantastic product from Shipnomics.  Shipnomics has released a cutting edge SaaS software service called <strong>Transportation Manager Pro</strong>.  If you are a logistics manager seeking a one stop location to track all of your domestic and international shipments, then <a href="http://www.3plwire.com/contact-us"><strong>contact us </strong></a>to schedule a demo today. </p>
<h4>What is Transportation Manager Pro?</h4>
<p><strong>Transportation Manager Pro is a hosted transportation management solution </strong>for enterprise customers, air/ocean freight carriers, and high-volume shippers needing to dramatically reduce operating expenses and the time required for logistics and inventory management.  The solution is an optimized transportation management tool with easy-to-use, web-based access.  </p>
<p> <strong>Transportation Manager Pro offers customers a low-cost</strong>, Software-as-a-Service solution with an enterprise software feature set rivaling the best in the industry. Transportation Manager Pro is not installed on-premise but is implemented and customized on-site typically in two weeks.  </p>
<p> Most importantly, customers report significant and palpable ROI immediately in terms of resource efficiencies, lower costs, and predictability.  </p>
<p> ShipNomics <strong>Transportation Manager Pro is integrated with hundreds of ocean and air freight carriers</strong>, providing least-cost routing and a reliable and real-time source of aggregated information and intelligence.</p>
<p> The solution includes an easy-to-use and easy access web portal for customers and <strong>makes managing all aspects of shipping logistics and carriers quick and efficient</strong>. In addition, it is completely customizable to meet even the most unique customer requirements.</p>
<h4>Key Benefits</h4>
<p>·      Dramatically reduces the time spent in managing and tracking shipments.</p>
<p>·      Delivers faster time-to-use due to hosted software model.  </p>
<p>·      Facilitates document compliance required by law and by carriers.</p>
<p>·      Ensures the highest level of shipping vessel capacity utilization.  </p>
<p>·      Provides a lower cost alternative compared to enterprise software solutions.</p>
<p>·      Improves inventory tracking resulting in lower levels of inventory on hand.</p>
<p>·      Enables improved communication with operations or retail customers and management.</p>
<h4>Key Features</h4>
<p><strong>Routing</strong></p>
<p>•     Manage carrier and fleet resources</p>
<p>•     Identify historical patterns, determine optimal utilization</p>
<p>•     Results in decreased costs and increased capacity</p>
<p><strong>Forwarding and Brokering</strong></p>
<p>•     Reduce labor and cycle times of forwarding and brokerage</p>
<p>•     Improve speed, accuracy, and predictability of the flow of information and goods</p>
<p><strong>Freight Payment, Billing, and Claims</strong></p>
<p>•     Automate processes of adding/editing freight payments, processes, and claims</p>
<p>•     Track and pay only for the services provided</p>
<p><strong>Reporting</strong></p>
<p>•     View data dashboard for better planning and execution </p>
<p>•     Avoid inefficiencies and make real-time changes</p>
<p>•     At-a-glance reports on costs, carrier efficiencies, etc. </p>
<p><strong>Inventory Visibility</strong></p>
<p>•     Automate tasks to reduce overhead</p>
<p>•     Manage vs. monitor inventory </p>
<p>•     Know on hand and in-transit amounts</p>
<p><strong>Operational Planning</strong></p>
<p>•     Manage users and security levels</p>
<p>•     Manage shipment details before/en route</p>
<p>•     Manage carrier relationships, responses</p>
<p><strong>Transportation Sourcing</strong></p>
<p>•     Automatically pull data from active transportation data hub </p>
<p>•     Build bid packages and load bids </p>
<h4>How Shipnomics Does It</h4>
<p>
        	It’s easy, once we are a part of your team. Our logistics experts have developed a fully functional logistics portal that interfaces with your local, international, ocean carrier, and air freight shippers. The Shipnomics portal allows you to easily and reliably track all your shipments from one convenient portal.</p>
<blockquote><p>
        	ShipNomics Pro is a complete, SaaS solution for shippers needing affordable<br />
            visibility of their domestic &amp; international shipments!</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>
        	Domestic &amp; International shipment tracking and reporting solutions</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>
        	Logistical and corporate process improvement and optimization.
        </p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>
        	Custom development solutions.</p></blockquote>
<p>        	<a href="http://www.3plwire.com/contact-us"><strong>Sign Up For a Demo or Consultation Now</strong></a> <span class="style1">to see how the shipnomics solution can help save your company money and time.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2009/09/16/shipnomics-shipment-visibility-platform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMR Research &#8211; Top 25 Supply Chains</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2009/05/29/amr-research-top-25-supply-chains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2009/05/29/amr-research-top-25-supply-chains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 04:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Splatty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=2484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s that time of year again.  AMR Research recently released their list of the top 25 global supply chains and for the second year in a row Apple Computer has claimed the top spot.
The methodology for ranking the top 25 is based on something AMR calls Demand Driven Performance.  Which, according to their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://3plwire.com/wp-content/apple1.jpg" class="picleft"  alt="" />It&#8217;s that time of year again.  AMR Research recently released their list of the top 25 global supply chains and for the second year in a row Apple Computer has claimed the top spot.</p>
<p>The methodology for ranking the top 25 is based on something AMR calls Demand Driven Performance.  Which, according to their website, &#8220;means global supply chains built to serve customers with both operational and innovation excellence&#8221;.  The Demand Driven Performance is made up of various financial metrics including inventory turns, revenue growth, and the opinions of AMR analysts and company peers.</p>
<blockquote><p>
The Supply Chain Top 25 ranking comprises two main components: financial and opinion. Public financial data gives us a view into how companies have performed in the past, while the opinion component provides an eye to future potential and reflects future expected leadership, a crucial characteristic. These two components are combined into a total composite score, with the financials accounting for 60% of the total score and the opinion piece 40%.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Dell took the second spot for 2009 up one place from last year&#8217;s rankings.  2008&#8217;s number two, Nokia, fell four spots to number six. </p>
<p>Spots 3 through 10 are as follows:</p>
<p>3.  Procter &#038; Gamble<br />
4.  IBM<br />
5.  Cisco Systems<br />
6.  Nokia<br />
7.  Wal-Mart Stores<br />
8.  Samsung Electronics<br />
9.  PepsiCo<br />
10.  Toyota Motor</p>
<p>For a full report of the AMR Research top 25 <a href="http://www.logisticsmgmt.com/article/CA6661563.html?rssid=60">click here</a>.</p>
<p>To compare how the companies performed in prior years <a href="http://www.amrresearch.com/supplychaintop25/#">click here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2009/05/29/amr-research-top-25-supply-chains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ATA court victory: What happens next? An interview with Curtis Whelan</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2009/04/06/ata-court-victory-what-happens-next-an-interview-with-curtis-whelan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2009/04/06/ata-court-victory-what-happens-next-an-interview-with-curtis-whelan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>3plwire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=2032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
On March 20th, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the ATA in its lawsuit against the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach concerning certain controversial portions of their Clean Truck Programs. Namely, the Port of Los Angeles&#8217; requirement that would ban owner-operators and force all drivers to be employees, as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span><br />
<em>On March 20th, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals <a href="http://www.3plwire.com/2009/03/20/breaking-news-court-rules-against-lalong-beach-clean-truck-program/">ruled in favor of the ATA</a> in its lawsuit against the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach concerning certain controversial portions of their Clean Truck Programs. Namely, the Port of Los Angeles&#8217; requirement that would ban owner-operators and force all drivers to be employees, as well as the concession agreements with the ports that would have regulated many aspects of trucking companies operations, such as parking restrictions, financial disclosures, etc. The Court of Appeals sent the case back down to the District Court with instructions for the District Court to &#8220;proceed as quickly as possible so that the ATA will not suffer unnecessary harm from any unconstitutional provisions&#8221;. </p>
<p>The following Monday, on March 23rd, we caught up with Curtis Whelan, the Executive Director of the ATA&#8217;s Intermodal Motor Carriers Conference (IMCC) to get his thoughts on the Court of Appeals decision and to learn what happens next. </em></p>
<p><strong>3PLwire</strong>:  So, in regards to the ruling, my understanding of the ruling is that the circuit court is sending the case back down to the U.S. District Court with orders that the judge grant an injunction against all or part of the concession plans so …</p>
<p><strong>ATA</strong>:  That’s correct</p>
<p><strong>3PLwire</strong>: …so what happens now?  What does this mean for the ATA and the ports?</p>
<p><strong>ATA</strong>:  <img src="http://3plwire.com/wp-content/ATA truck1.jpg" class="picleft"  alt="" />Well, we have&#8230;the normal process for these things are you call the lower courts clerk and ask them what schedule they plan on following, what would they like to do, I mean, the ranges of scheduling oral arguments, having some sort of a status phone call, conference call with the parties, so there’s a variety of things that the judge could schedule.  Our concern number one is to make sure she schedules it very quickly and I think the court of appeals underscored that there is harm being done, that this is an issue that needs to be addressed very quickly, it’s one of the reasons they denied rehearing or any kind of filing of appeal at the court of appeals level.  So I think they have underscored through Judge Snyder that this needs to be done quickly and here’s at a minimum what you need to do, which is what you described earlier, they have to grant a preliminary injunction.  Certainly on the employee requirements, certainly on the parking issues and then in the body of the opinion they went through several other issues the financial disclosure requirements and some of the other things which they find to be wanting in terms of her analysis. They also told her that they applauded her in many ways for her thought process that led her to conclude that we would on the merit’s win, the market participation issue which the ports had raised in which one of their key issues that the teamsters certainly were espousing and that we would also win on the issue of the sovereignty of the tidelands which is where the ports are situated.  Somehow acting under the Tidelands Act they had protection from Federal preemption. Judge Snyder in her ruling, back in September, said that she didn’t think it was going to carry the day for the ports. And the Court of Appeals confirmed that, indeed, this will not. Which leaves us then is the issue that she was reversed on which is finding some sort of protection from Federal preemption because of the safety, security related issues, that she found that the Ports program addressed. And they said, “No, it does not.” These are not safety security issues. These look like economic regulation and to the extent that there’s something that’s safety security related, those can be found in the transportation worker identity card issue and all the other ones that are out there.</p>
<p><strong>3PLwire</strong>: Ok.</p>
<p><strong>ATA</strong>: It was a very comprehensive ruling. It very much reflected the oral argument for those of us that sat through that on March the 4th now, of all three Justices were very much engaged in asking the Ports to clarify various things. They seemed skeptical almost 100% of the time on the Ports’ answer. So we came away from the oral argument in early March being pretty positive. But you always have to wait until they actually write an opinion. In this case the opinion seemed to square very much with what they had been asking and what they had expressed their sort of dubious interpretations of these vis-à-vis the Ports. </p>
<p><strong>3PLwire</strong>: You mentioned the Court of Appeals stated they would not try to entertain any petition for rehearing. Do you think the Ports will now appeal to the Supreme Court and if so, do you have any kind of timeline that would be?</p>
<p><strong>ATA</strong>: Well, my guess, I mean I think they can, I haven’t researched that. It’s always been sort of presumed, but again, the Supreme Court is the one that on February 20th of last year gave a 9-0 opinion on a state activity that was dealing with routes, rates and services. And the main activity which was involved as far left government control than what the Ports have done, there was no great quotes in Maine about how their entity was trying to control trucking, reshape it, increase, decrease the number of motor carriers participating, all of that dialog, is even much better than what was going on in the Maine case. And that was 9-0. So if they want to go there, fine. </p>
<p><strong>3PLwire</strong>: Ok, I also want to touch base really quick on the FMC investigation into the Ports’ Clean Truck plans and I know that’s separate from what you guys are doing but it’s still related to that. I’ll admit to not knowing enough about it, so what happens now with the FMC investigation. I assume that’s still on going. Correct? </p>
<p><strong>ATA</strong>: <img src="http://3plwire.com/wp-content/ATA container1.jpg" class="picleft"  alt="" />Yeah, there’s really two processes going on at the FMC. And we are interveners in one. There’s a main case that was filed, I mean, the central case, not Maine case, we already mentioned Maine. There’s a central case that was filed back in the fall, that basically under section ten of the Shipping Act which deals with a variety of fairness and nondiscrimination provisions. The FMC voted and has initiated an investigation of the, basically the entire Ports’ program, Clean Truck program and they identified I think twelve or thirteen specific areas in total. They’re basically describing the whole program. And under that procedure an Administrative Law judge has been appointed and he’s beginning to put together fact finding efforts, setting times for depositions and things, and just sort of setting up for a huge investigation. He has until the September of this year to complete that work. And then, by I believe it’s January of 2010, the Commissioners have to vote, accept the findings, accept the recommendations, or pick and choose whatever it is that they want. So that’s the investigation that is not in certainly the short term, although it’s amazing now that we’re in ’09 that doesn’t seem very long but when it started last Fall it seemed like a long time away. But they have an underlying process that will yield recommendations and findings and such as to whether or not the Ports’ activity on a whole bunch of specific Clean Truck issues is legal, is not, is discriminatory, is not, those kinds of things. Secondly, they have a filed, it’s the only time they’ve used relatively new law that was passed back in the late 90’s, they filed in the U.S. District Court a request for preliminary injunction over the Ports’ implementation of various elements of the Clean Truck program. They had an oral argument before the U.S. District Court on December the 5th, I believe. And they are now awaiting the judge’s determination on whether or not they, the FMC, will get a preliminary injunction now. The preliminary injunction that the FMC is seeking is more extensive than the one we were seeking. They, indeed, are challenging the fees. So if they were to prevail on what they requested, the Port would be stopped from even collecting the fees.</p>
<p><strong>3PLwire</strong>: Interesting.</p>
<p><strong>ATA</strong>: <img src="http://3plwire.com/wp-content/ATA port.jpg" class="picleft"  alt="" />We are specifically not trying to challenge the fees, because that to us is a…if you’re going to retire trucks under mandate, you have some funding source to be able to replace them and that’s what the Container Fee did. We have always argued that our lawsuit, and I think the judge has also looked at that, doesn’t really stop the Ports from the Clean Air portions of their proposal. We’re not challenging the truck retirement, although we do note publicly and I’ll be making some speeches soon, I mean, some of these things is the next round of truck retirements is at the end of this year and the number is anywhere between eight, ten thousand trucks will fall under the next axe. Now, in this economy, it’s hard to believe even with subsidies that you’re going to find a lot of people going out there to buy 2010 or 2007 trucks. But again that’s something the Ports have to decide, but we are not challenging that, we are not challenging the fees, we are not challenging the maintenance of the underlying data system, the truck driver registry, and that’s how they evaluate and read what truck’s going in and out of the gate, what year is it, those kinds of things. We’re not trying to mess up the Clean Truck portion of this, the environmental savings and such. But we are challenging the concession agreement, which to us is a contract which blocks entry into a deregulated market. </p>
<p><strong>3PLwire</strong>: Sure. </p>
<p><strong>ATA</strong>: But again, the FMC is going farther, because what they see is the fee system discriminates, obviously they’ve got a system where if you already can afford your own 2007 trucks, you don’t have to pay the fee, therefore you can go out and undercut somebody who still has a decent truck, but you can undercut their rate and move into their customer market because there is a fee set up. Is that discriminatory, yes or no? Should it be allowed, yes or no? That’s what the FMC is looking at. </p>
<p><strong>3PLwire</strong>: Ok.</p>
<p><strong>ATA</strong>: So theirs is broader, more complicated, but it’s a different process.</p>
<p><strong>3PLwire</strong>: I’m glad you mentioned the ATA stance, that you haven’t been challenging any of the environmental issues with the Clean Truck plan. I’m sure you already know this but the Natural Resources Defense Council issued a press release on Friday stating that, “This decision today places in jeopardy the Clean Air goals of the Ports as well as every Port infrastructure expansion project that relies on clean trucks. I’m curious to know…</p>
<p><strong>ATA</strong>: <img src="http://3plwire.com/wp-content/ATA containers.jpg" class="picleft"  alt="" />Well, that’s nonsense. It’s typical of David Petit. I was on a panel with him in the early part of the month in California. I mean, again, that’s, unfortunately some groups always come out with the negatives and the scare tactics. What has screwed up their environmental “cleaning” of this whole thing is the Ports pretty much abandoned one huge element of their program. Originally designed, if you wanted to get a Port loan, a grant or whatever, to get a new truck, you had to turn in for scrappage your old truck. And that makes sense, because, particularly with the pre-‘89 trucks that were banned as of October the 1st of last year, according to the Ports’ statistics, that one trigger, that getting rid of those older trucks, would give them fifty percent of the eighty percent savings that they attribute to the Clean Truck program. As far as we can tell, basically none of those trucks were scrapped. They shoved them out the gate, they won’t let them work there, but they did not…none of those people got new loans as far as we can tell. There’s only been thirty-two loans and keys passed to new applicants to get new trucks. And even if you assume all of those were the pre-‘89’s, that still leaves 2700 dirty trucks that could potentially be moving outside the gate, moving other things other than Port containers. I just read today that the Port of Long Beach just passed something, which, again, tries to make in one sense a little bit fairer if you have an &#8216;07 truck, you don’t have to pay the Container Fee. Under their old program, though, the &#8216;07 truck either had to be in business October the 1st or under a purchase order that was dated by December 31st of 2008. They’ve now said any truck that you finance will not have to pay the fee, but they also waive the requirement that you turn in a dirty truck. They have basically shoved the problem out of the gate. Those trucks again, the markets down, those trucks can certainly still run within the basin of L.A. and they don’t have any walls up, so whatever spewed out can be spewed out and go right back into the Port. But they abandon the one catch that would make sure that those trucks were scrapped. I think David Petit, particularly, in all of his [report] is totally inaccurate in what he describes. It has nothing to do with ATA and our lawsuit. It has everything to do with how the Ports are implementing a program. And we will continue to start beating on that; because, most people haven’t thought about it. They get this idea that those old trucks are off the road and they are not. </p>
<p><strong>3PLwire</strong>: Interesting.</p>
<p><strong>ATA</strong>: We were not challenging the retirement of those trucks or any other. So we’re disappointed that they have not…some of their original big plan which came out in that big book, San Pedro plan, had balance to it. I didn’t like all of it obviously, but that was one portion that made sense. If you basically want to cut somebody out of the business, where those trucks are otherwise legal in California and the rest of the country, you got to have an enticement to do that. So the enticement was a loan, and the key to the loan was, you’ve got to give me that truck and we’ll scrap it. You can’t use it somewhere else. You can’t ship it to Mexico. You can’t do all of these very normal things that people have done over the years with older trucks. That made, to me, sense as to why and how you’d set something up. But they’ve totally abandoned that. When you read all these things about, “Wow! We’re well on our way. We’ve gotten fifty percent of the clean up now…” The only clean up that you’re getting in that Port is because the economy went to hell.</p>
<p><strong>3PLwire</strong>: [laughs]</p>
<p><strong>ATA</strong>: Seriously, they’re down forty-some percent in Long Beach and thirty-some percent in L.A. There should be a corresponding savings in emissions. They say it’s the program and I’ll tell them it’s the economy and your program, you abandoned the best parts of it. </p>
<p><strong>3PLwire</strong>: And the next thing you’ll see is they’ll start saying, “Well, the business isn’t there so why do we need to expand infrastructure.” That’ll be the next thing they’ll say.</p>
<p><strong>ATA</strong>: And again, David’s point on that is the environmentalists have set a very high bar for expansion and in order to get in the new terminals and the new facilities, you have to reduce emissions by “blank,” and that blank was made up by them. There’s no magic about it but accept whatever the number is. And quite frankly, they don’t want any expansion in the Port, and they know it, I know it, and everybody else knows it. But it looks good on paper to say, “We’ll let expansion go on if you do X, Y and Z, in terms of emission reduction.” The bottom line is, they’re always turning on that and finding another reason to challenge the expansion. It takes years and years now in L.A. and Long Beach, and that’s why they’re getting traffic diverted to other ports who are likewise concerned about emissions, but are not trying to shut down the businesses that are there and bring prosperity to the area. </p>
<p><strong>3PLwire</strong>: Right. Mr. Whelan, thank you very much for your time.</p>
<p><strong>ATA</strong>: Sure, anytime.</p>
<p><strong>3PLwire</strong>: I appreciate it.<br />
</span></p>
<p>For those of you who would like to learn more about the background of the Clean Truck Programs and the controversial issues surrounding some of the elements of the programs, please refer to <a href="http://www.3plwire.com/2009/03/20/breaking-news-court-rules-against-lalong-beach-clean-truck-program/">our original post on the court ruling here</a> and scroll down to see a list of handy links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2009/04/06/ata-court-victory-what-happens-next-an-interview-with-curtis-whelan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking News: Court rules against LA/Long Beach Clean Truck Program</title>
		<link>http://www.3plwire.com/2009/03/20/breaking-news-court-rules-against-lalong-beach-clean-truck-program/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3plwire.com/2009/03/20/breaking-news-court-rules-against-lalong-beach-clean-truck-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SwizStick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3plwire.com/?p=2008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via TheTrucker.com:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of the American Trucking Associations (ATA) today in its lawsuit seeking an injunction against the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach Concession Plans.
The three-judge panel ruled unanimously to remand the case to the U.S. District Court and indicated that the judge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="http://www.thetrucker.com/News/Stories/2009/3/20/USCourtofAppealsrulesinfavorofATAinlawsuitagainstports.aspx">TheTrucker.com</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of the American Trucking Associations (ATA) today in its lawsuit seeking an injunction against the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach Concession Plans.</p>
<p>The three-judge panel ruled unanimously to remand the case to the U.S. District Court and indicated that the judge should grant the ATA an injunction against all or part of the concession plans.</p>
<p>“In short, motor carriers should not be required to adhere to the various unconstitutional provisions in the Ports’ [concession] agreements, and are likely to suffer irrevocably if forced to do that or give up their businesses,” the court’s opinion said. ATA had not challenged the ports’ Clean Truck Program, which bans older trucks and uses a container fee to subsidize the purchase of newer, cleaner trucks.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Here&#8217;s more from the <a href="http://joc.com/node/410218">Journal of Commerce</a>: </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The district court shall proceed as quickly as possible so that ATA will not suffer unnecessary harm from any unconstitutional provisions,&#8221; the appellate court stated. The judges also said they will not entertain a petition for rehearing.</p>
<p>Of most immediacy, it appears that the Port of Los Angeles can not require that harbor trucking companies by the end of this year must replace 20 percent of their owner-operator drivers with employee drivers.</p>
<p>&#8220;That requirement is dead,&#8221; said Curtis Whalen, executive director of the ATA&#8217;s intermodal conference. &#8220;We are very pleased with this decision,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>The Los Angeles-Long Beach clean-truck program seeks to reduce pollution from harbor trucks by 80 percent over the next five years. The trucking industry supports that goal and noted that a number of motor carriers have already introduced into their fleets new clean-diesel or liquefied natural gas vehicles that comply with the ports&#8217; strict emission standards.</p>
<p>However, the program also requires that motor carriers sign concession agreements with the ports that govern many aspects of their operations. The 9th Circuit said some of the requirements, such as the employee-driver mandate, financial disclosure statements and truck parking restrictions amount to state or local regulation of interstate trucking. The appellate court said such regulation is clearly preempted by federal law.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Needless to say, the Naural Resources Defense Council, who supported the employee-driver mandate, <a href="http://www.nrdc.org/media/2009/090320.asp">is not pleased</a>: </p>
<blockquote><p>“This decision today places in jeopardy the clean air goals at the ports, as well as every port infrastructure expansion project that relies on clean trucks.  We’re going to vigorously fight to protect these truck plans in court.  Properly maintained, well-managed goods movement at the ports is good for business and good for the health of people living in port communities.”
</p></blockquote>
<p>The funny thing is, I would venture a guess that the ATA and the trucking interests in the ports would agree completely with the last sentence of that paragraph. I can&#8217;t find any indication that the trucking industry is challenging any of the environmental elements of the Clean Truck Program, apparently has no problem with the drayage truck registry or the upgrading/replacement of older trucks, etc. It&#8217;s only the concessionary agreements, particularly the employee-driver mandate, that they have opposed. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see what else we can learn about this, but in the meantime, or for those of you who are just stumbling onto this topic, here&#8217;s a lot more info for you: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.3plwire.com/2008/10/23/ata-vs-lalong-beach-port-authorities-the-battle-continues/">ATA vs. LA/Long Beach port authorities: the battle continues</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.3plwire.com/2008/10/12/ata-legal-challenges-to-lalong-beach-concession-plans-its-not-over-yet/">ATA legal challendes to LA/Long Beach &#8220;concession plans&#8221; &#8211; it&#8217;s not over yet. </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.3plwire.com/2008/09/25/ata-appeal-denied-by-ninth-circuit-court/">ATA appeal denied by Ninth Circuit Court</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.3plwire.com/2008/09/24/fmc-to-possibly-derail-oct-1-clean-truck-plan-implementation-date/">FMC to possibly derail Oct. 1 Clean Truck Plan implementation date?</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.3plwire.com/2008/09/23/lalong-beach-clean-trucks-program-on-track-to-start-october-1st/">LA/Long Beach Clean Trucks Program on track to start October 1st</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.3plwire.com/2008/09/15/ata-american-trucking-association-goes-to-appeals-court-to-stop-socal-ports-truck-plans/">ATA goes to appeals court to stop SoCal ports&#8217; truck plans</a><br />
<a href="http://www.3plwire.com/2008/07/24/american-trucking-association-ata-takes-ports-to-court-over-clean-truck-proposals/"><br />
ATA takes ports to court over Clean Truck proposals</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.3plwire.com/2008/02/20/clean-trucks-program-in-los-angeles-long-beach-approved/">LA/Long Beach Clean Truck Program approved</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.3plwire.com/2007/08/13/truckers-coalition-opposes-portions-of-the-clean-air-action-plan/">Truckers coalition opposes portions of the Clean Air Action Plan</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.3plwire.com/2007/05/09/environmental-issues-threaten-competitiveness-in-southern-california/">Environmental issues threaten competitiveness in Southern California</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3plwire.com/2009/03/20/breaking-news-court-rules-against-lalong-beach-clean-truck-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
